Monsoon3 #vn13.9 #Nudging
Hi,
I’m getting this error with my suite u-du347.
? Error from routine: STWORK
? Error message: STWORK: Number of fields exceeds reserved headers for unit 20
I see some of the tickets asking about this but I’m not sure if it’s the same problem.
This suite is descended from the UKESM standard job u-dr799. The direct copy of this, u-du141, completed running for 3 months fine. In u-du216 I converted it from historic to 2015- simulation and it also ran without a problem. In u-du347, I’m trying to implement nudging.
pe_out tells me that unit 20 is pp130, which I use for pm output (UPM) for monthly means. reserved_header was originally set to 60,000. I increased it little by little and now it’s 600,000 (10x bigger) and it’s till failing.
I think I set it 400,000 in the previous run, and the run failed in day 20, now it fails in day 29. To complete a cycle of 3 months, maybe I should set it to 2,000,000 ? Or should I set a cycle to be 1 months and reserved_header something like 1M? The suite currently includes lots of stash requests that I don’t need (but they do not include what I need yet), so I may be able to reduce the number of them.
But is it OK? I feel it strange. I turned on nudging, changed calendar to Gregorian, and added a few stash requests required for nudging but using a different usage (UPUKCA). For UPM, I think I added only 3 diagnostics: section 39 items 3, 8, 13.
So I feel that the problem may be something else. I changed reinit_step from 30 days to 1 real month for example, and any of these might be causing a problem?
Oh, this can provide a hint. Output size has been hugely increased and it appears to me to suggest that something might have gone wrong.
-rw-r–r–. 1 masaru.yoshioka.ext asci 5036756992 Nov 11 12:26 du216a.pm2015mar
-rw-r–r–. 1 masaru.yoshioka.ext asci 124390473728 Nov 13 16:29 du347a.pm2015jan
Below is an output from my vn13.7 suite for comparison. It is nudged with all necessary diagnostics requested and without all unnecessary ones. It is a pp file so the size of a field file would be twice as big.
-rw-r–r-- 1 myoshioka gws_asci 1396073008 May 26 11:23 dq162a.py20161201.pp
Have you seen something like this? Can you suggest anything I can try?
I said the other day that I was having a problem in committing suites but it was turned out to be a suite specific problem, and committing works fine with other suites. So all suites mentioned here are committed, if you need to check them.
Thanks.
Masaru

